Advanced Vulnerability Research & Critical Infrastructure Assurance
We audit the deep logic of core libraries, SDKs, and authentication systems to find "Day Zero" risks that standard penetration tests miss.
Findings you can act on. Judgement you can stand behind.
Not a compliance automation platform.
What you receive
Executive Risk Brief
A concise, leadership-ready brief explaining how a breach could realistically occur, what the impact would be, and which decisions matter most now. Designed for boards, investors, and senior stakeholders.
Technical Findings Dossier
Clear documentation of validated vulnerability research, written for engineers. Each issue includes proof-of-concept evidence, exploit reasoning, and precise remediation guidance.
Remediation Map
A prioritised view of what to fix now, what can wait, and why — balancing impact, likelihood, and effort. Built to support planning, not overwhelm teams.
Who this is for
- CTOs and founders of critical infrastructure or high-assurance platforms
- Security leads responsible for core SDKs, authentication gateways, and widely distributed libraries
- Teams who have outgrown standard penetration testing and need deep-dive logic analysis
How this is different
Research-led methodology
We don’t just run scans. We reverse engineer logic, analyze dependencies, and find architectural flaws (like Zip Bombs or logical bypasses) that automated tools miss.
Critical system focus
Specialised in high-stakes environments: authentication providers, financial infrastructure, and core SDKs.
Proof-of-concept evidence
We verify findings with working exploit code, not theoretical "what-ifs."
Judgement over volume
Fewer findings, each thoroughly validated and contextualised.
No security theatre
No padded reports. No inflated severity. No checkbox compliance.
How engagements work
Qualification call
Understand your context, constraints, and what you need to learn.
NDA and scoping
Define scope, access, assumptions, and deliverables.
Deep-dive analysis
Manual vulnerability research, reverse engineering, and logic analysis.
Delivery
Walk-through of validated findings and handover of written outputs.
Questions
That is a valid and valuable outcome. The report documents what was examined, how it was reviewed, and why no material risks were identified. Clean results are meaningful evidence for stakeholders.
Yes. Deep vulnerability research requires read-only access to repositories. This allows us to find logic flaws that are invisible to external "black-box" testing.
Access is strictly limited to what is necessary. Code is not reused, shared, or retained beyond the engagement. NDAs are standard.
No. Penetration tests typically focus on known vulnerabilities and external attack surfaces. Our service is "Vulnerability Research" — we analyze the internal logic, dependencies, and architecture to find novel, zero-day flaws unique to your system.
Engagements typically begin within one to two weeks, depending on scope and availability.